|
Back to The Graduate
School Medal
General Information about the Medal
The Graduate School
Medal Announcement
The Graduate School
Medal Nomination Procedures
The Graduate School Medal Nomination Form
Medalist
FAQ Page
Past Medal Winners
The Graduate School Medal
|
|
|
KAREN ROSENBERG
Women Studies
As a Ph.D. candidate in Women Studies, Karen
Rosenberg is researching "the critical question of the relative effectiveness of
models of social justice, focusing her project on the domain of family
violence." Her dissertation will compare responses to family violence in
Canada and the United States.
Ms. Rosenberg's personal statement:
"We are constantly being astonished at the amazing
discoveries in the field of violence. But I maintain that far more
undreamt of and seemingly impossible discoveries will be made in the field of
nonviolence." Mahatma Gandhi
"The adage that peace is far more than the absence of war
has animated my life for the past decade. My work focuses on peace and
safety in the home, which I firmly believe is the fundamental building block of
a peaceful society. My work asks: how can a society best respond when
there is violence in the home? What role should the law play in mediating
family relationships? What do responses to family violence reveal about
the society that enacts them? And, how do these answers differ across
national contexts? I approach these questions from both inside and outside
of the academy. I find that this interplay has enabled me to find greater
meaning--and have far greater impact--than if I stood in one sphere alone.
Plainly, my work is about creating change. I do this through teaching,
collaborative framing of my research project, and using my work to create new
spaces for critical dialogue.
I am particularly interested in creating innovative
dialogue across axes of difference--including class, race, gender, nationality
and age. In my work as a domestic violence legal advocate, I developed and
ran many trainings for survivors of violence, advocates, attorneys, law
enforcement, and others. In these trainings I searched for ways for
participants to think about larger issues of social change. A nagging
sense that I needed more critical tools in order to do my work led me to enter
the doctoral program in Women Studies. I entered the program wanting to
bridge the worlds of 'activism' and 'academia,' though I now conceptualize these
two categories as thoroughly interrelated and constantly look for spaces to
combine the tow. As a Huckabay Fellow (2002-2003), I explored ways
to create dialogue in the classroom, as part of a new introductory transnational
feminist theory course. I take insights from this project into the
community work. In 2005 I represented Dr. Betty Schmitz and the Center for
Curriculum Transformation at a pan-American conference on gender and education
in Santiago, Chile. Conference participants seamlessly integrated their
roles as academics and activists, and I learned a tremendous amount from them.
As a participant in the Simpson Center's 2004 Connecting with the Community
Institute, I learned new tools and strategies for crafting a career as a public
scholar. I was inspired by the faculty speakers who integrated deep social
concern with their research agendas, and I was struck by the importance they
placed on creating new venues and tools for dialogue.
"I offer three examples that illustrate how I seek to
foster critical dialogue for social change in the field of domestic violence,
and how I integrate this dialogue into my research. In 2001, the domestic
violence organization I worked with decided to increase their efforts to effect
social change. However, they didn't know how to operationalize this goal.
The Executive Director asked me to research this. I did a literature
review, interviewed national leaders in domestic violence advocacy, and
interviewed 29 staff members. The staff interviews revealed real confusion
about the meaning of social change as well as deep race- and class-inflected
animosities. I presented this information to the Executive Director and
the staff in both written and workshop form, which helped the organization
specify what they meant by social change and develop strategies to attain it.
I then used this data as the basis for my Master's thesis. I historicized
the agency's experiences and applied insights from feminist theory to their
situation. I have shared these insights with the agency as well as with
other activist and academic communities. I am also preparing them for
publication.
"In my work with the Washington State Coalition Against
Domestic Violence, I helped develop a domestic violence educational tool called
'In Her Shoes.' Based on the real experiences of women in abusive
relationship, the tool asks participants to make life choices based on
exceedingly limited options. 'In Her Shoes' is now used in national and
international settings because of its effectiveness in conveying the immediacy
and complexity of domestic violence. I shared this tool with colleagues at
Programs for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH), an international public
health organization. PATH then decided to work with its partners in Latin
America to create a version based on the experiences of Latin American women.
I had the honor of working on this collaboration and presented the project
history and methodology at a conference in Nicaragua in 2005. I continue
to be humbled and awed by the reception 'In Her Shoes' receives. Last
week, for example, a domestic violence advocate at the Fort Lewis military base
told me that she uses it with all new recruits. She described the
contradictions in teaching nonviolence within the military (even on a physical
level: she trains in rooms with tanks), and said that 'In Her Shoes' has been a
'magic key' that enables her to start dialogue on healthy relationships.
"Since 1996 I have been involved in a statewide domestic
violence training for advocates, police officers, and prosecutors. I was a
conference participant, a conference trainer, and the conference coordinator.
I helped write the three day curriculum--a curriculum designed to surface deeply
held prejudices and misconceptions that interfere with protecting domestic
violence survivors. Some years, simply keeping people sitting at the same
table has been a challenge. However, during the past two years our
training team has seen a shift in attitude: police officers and prosecutors are
increasingly willing to hear about survivors' experiences and advocates are more
willing to hear how tough it is to uphold imperfect laws.
"My work with this training, including in-depth discussions
with legal actors across the state, has shaped my dissertation research. I
have heard an increasingly urgent critique of the law-and-order approach to
domestic violence, even from those that work within the legal system. Criminalization has been criticized for its lack of effectiveness, punitive
impacts on some victims, and neglect of the root causes of domestic violence.
My interest in social justice and creating the conditions for peaceful homes
leads me to ask, '(how) can the legal system work more effectively? What
alternatives to criminalization are being practiced? How are they
working?' I have decided to address these questions comparatively,
focusing on Canada and the United States. Canada has been more willing to
explore alternative justice models, such as restorative justice and
community-based mediation. My dissertation will compare responses to
family violence in Canada and the United States, with an eye toward
strengthening intellectual and activist bridges across these sites.
"In my work both within and beyond the academy, I search
for what Gandhi so eloquently calls 'the far more undreamt of and seemingly
impossible discoveries' in creating homes that are free of violence. I am
honored to be considered for the Graduate [School] Medal for this work."
| Return to the Top |
|